|
'He's still
with us'
Fifty years
since his death, Joseph Stalin haunts the
Russians. In fact, the Man of Steel who
built the Iron Curtain is making a comeback.
Was he a mass murderer or just
misunderstood? Even his great-grandson
wonders just what to believe
In his palace in Baghdad, increasingly
isolated from the rest of the world as war
looms, Saddam Hussein is said to seek
inspiration on his bookcase -- from the many
volumes he treasures that contain the
writing of another infamous mustached
dictator.
Joseph
Stalin, the legend goes, is one of the few
people Mr. Hussein looks up to. He sees his
own story as linked to the former Soviet
leader's -- Stalin survived famine and war
and accusations that he was killing his own
people to remain in power until the day he
died.
Half a world
away in North Korea, as the sabre-rattling
Kim Jong Il pushes his country toward a
confrontation with the West, the Dear Leader
basks in the constant adulation of his
citizens -- a cult of personality
consciously built on the Stalinist model. He
has gone much further in his hero worship
than erecting a few statues; since assuming
power in 1994, Mr. Kim has imitated
everything from Stalin's labour camps to his
penchant for nuclear brinkmanship.
It's perhaps
no surprise that Mr. Kim, famously linked to
Mr. Hussein in George W. Bush's "axis of
evil," looks up to Stalin. His father was
installed by Moscow in 1945.
In her
two-room Moscow apartment, 85-year-old
Galina Ionova hugs a book praising the man
she says saved the Motherland, and explains
why she thinks that Stalin is still having
an impact five decades after his death.
"Stalin was a
genius. None of us common people can
understand what he was guided by," the
retired history professor says, eyes glowing
with an almost religious fervour. "Stalin is
not our past. He's our present and our
future."
Next
Wednesday will mark 50 years since Iosif
Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili -- also known as
Koba the Dread and Joseph Stalin -- died
peacefully at his countryside dacha near
Moscow, ending one of the more violent
periods in Russian and world history.
To most of
the planet, Stalin's legacy is clear. He was
a monster. The number of people executed by
the secret police and other government
organs during his 29-year reign is still
being counted, but is known to be in the
millions. Tens of millions more died during
mass famines that he organized from his
Kremlin office, ranking him with Adolf
Hitler and Mao Tsetung as one of the bigger
murderers in recent world history. Among his
more minor crimes, Stalin bulldozed churches
and sent entire ethnic groups into exile.
But in
Russia, the anniversary of Stalin's death
will be remembered with deeply mixed
feelings. He may have terrorized this
country and killed millions of its citizens,
but he also presided over a period that saw
the Soviet Union transformed from a backward
peasant state into an economic and military
superpower, a time that inspires nostalgia
for many.
Many here
believe that Stalin's crimes have been
exaggerated by his enemies. Many, many more
see him as the heroic figure who rallied the
country when the Nazi army was at the edge
of Moscow, and led the Soviet Union to
victory in what is known here as the Great
Patriotic War. That single accomplishment,
many say, balances or perhaps outweighs all
the evil Stalin wrought.
"We fought
the war for the Motherland, for Stalin," Ms.
Ionova's war-veteran husband, Alexander,
says solemnly. "If he repressed so many
millions, who was fighting in the war?"
The centre of
next week's celebrations will be the
dictator's sleepy hometown, Gori, an hour's
drive outside Tbilisi, capital of the former
Soviet republic of Georgia. Although Stalin,
who grew contemptuous of his fellow
Georgians while in power, is believed to
have visited only once after leaving the
place as a teenaged troublemaker, the entire
town has become a shrine to its famous
native son, the only place in the former
Soviet Union where a statue of Stalin still
stands on the town's main square.
But it is
Gori's renowned Stalin Museum, housed in a
marble neo-Renaissance palace near the
centre of town, that will be the target of
many a pilgrimage in the next few days. Its
exhibits include poetry written by Stalin in
his youth, the furniture from his Kremlin
office, and the death mask that covered his
face for his public funeral, when weeping
millions converged on Red Square.
What's missing from the museum's collection
is any mention of the purges. Not one
exhibit makes even passing reference to the
millions who suffered in what author
Alexander Solzhenitsyn later dubbed the
Gulag Archipelago that stretched across the
barren land mass of Siberia and present-day
Kazakhstan.
That suits
Yevgeny Dzhugashvili, Stalin's grandson,
just fine. A retired military colonel who
cultivates his resemblance to his
grandfather to the point of trying to grow
an identical mustache, Mr. Dzhugashvili
dismisses the charges that Stalin was a mass
murderer as "all lies." The real culprit, he
says, was Leon Trotsky, his grandfather's
rival in the fight to take over the
Bolshevik party after the death of Vladimir
Lenin. Stalin later had Trotsky
assassinated.
"They always
call them Stalin's repressions. Yes, there
were mass repressions and the best people of
the country were killed or exiled, but they
were organized by Trotsky and his gang. It's
not Stalin who blew up the churches, it was
Trotsky," argues Mr. Dzhugashvili, who tried
to become Georgia's president, but couldn't
because he's a Russian citizen.
Instead of
being condemned, he says, his grandfather
should be praised for tracking down the "Trotskyists
and Jews" behind the purges, and bringing
them to justice in the infamous show trials
of the 1930s.
"Stalin
punished them for those repressions and he
did it with open trials, publicly," he
explains. "If they were not guilty, they
were released, gradually. [Stalin's] enemies
don't have any conscience and they invent
any figures, like Solzhenitsyn, who named
110 million victims."
He says he
even admires the way his grandfather allowed
his oldest son Yakov -- Mr. Dzhugashvili's
father -- to die. An artillery lieutenant,
Yakov was captured in 1943 by German troops
who offered to trade him for a captured
field marshal. Stalin refused.
"War is war,"
he supposedly said. "All soldiers are my
sons. What am I going to say to other
mothers? I don't exchange a soldier for a
field marshal." He even had Yakov's wife
interrogated, bizarrely fearing it was all a
plot to embarrass him. The Germans left
Yakov's bullet-riddled body hanging on a
barbed-wire fence for the advancing Red Army
to recover.
Diana
Suvarova was eight years old in 1937, when
the knock at the door that all Soviet
citizens feared came. A year later, her
father, Mikhail Suvarova, was executed by
the NKVD, Stalin's secret police.
"Nobody knows why they chose him," the
78-year-old retired librarian now says. "It
was totally unexpected. They just came one
night and took him."
The crimes he
was accused of were many. While he was a
farmer, the police said, Mr. Suvarova had
been poisoning the wells and killing cows.
Later, when he worked on the railway near
the city of Kursk, he had been "organizing
train wrecks." According to the case file,
the NKVD also believed the elementary-school
graduate had been spying for an unnamed
foreign country.
Ms. Suvarova
says her father, like many of Stalin's
victims, was a good Communist who taught his
children to look up to their country's
leader.
She got the same sort of education at
school. Stalin, she learned, was a selfless
man who did everything for his country and
his people. Ms. Suvarova learned this lesson
so well that when her father disappeared,
she believed he must have been guilty of
some crime.
After his
arrest, the whole family was tainted for
being associated with an "enemy of the
people." Thrown out of their comfortable
apartment in central Moscow, they moved to
the outskirts of the city, and her mother
kept her job only because her employer took
a personal risk and chose to look the other
way. People on the street shunned them, not
wanting to raise the suspicion of the NKVD.
"Even when I was a child, people would cross
the street so as not to meet a child of an
enemy of the people," Ms. Suvarova recalls.
For years,
the family believed her father was just in
prison, and that all would be made well as
soon as Comrade Stalin realized how his
secret police were running out of control.
Right to the end, Ms. Suvarova believed that
Stalin was unaware of the terror his thugs
had unleashed. She cried on March 5, 1953,
when she heard that he had died, grieving
for the man who was ultimately responsible
for her father's death.
"We really
believed, like good young Communists.
Despite what happened to our parents, we
believed in him, we loved him. That's how we
were educated. We thought maybe he didn't
know."
Arseny Roginsky has devoted his life to
proving just the opposite. Born to two
political prisoners in a camp near the
northern city of Archangelsk, he now heads
Memorial, a Russian human-rights
organization dedicated to chronicling the
true extent of Stalin's crimes.
Memorial has
compiled a list of 12 million victims of the
gulags, and another one million who were
executed by the secret police. Documentary
evidence shows Stalin personally signed off
on at least 40,000 of the murders.
For Mr.
Roginsky, the painstaking work is a way of
trying to understand his own past. His
father was arrested for anti-Communist
activities in 1938, just before the war. His
mother endured the "900 days" Nazi siege of
Leningrad, then travelled to the Velsk
prison camp, whose supervisor gave them
special dispensation to live together since
the father's sentence was formally over,
even if he was not yet allowed to leave.
Being born in
a prison camp, Mr. Roginsky says with a
smile, had its advantages. The people Stalin
terrorized the most -- because he saw them
as potential threats to his power -- were
the intellectuals. As a result, many of the
country's top doctors were in the camps, to
the extent that average citizens often asked
to be treated at prison hospitals.
His father
was eventually released, only to be arrested
again a few years later. He died during his
second stint in the gulag. It was 1951, two
years before Stalin's death. Thirty years
later, near the end of Leonid Brezhnev's
reign as Soviet leader, Mr. Roginsky himself
was arrested for trying to research Stalin's
crimes, and sent to a labour camp not far
from the one in Velsk where he'd been born.
He was released four years later, shortly
after Mikhail Gorbachev took over as
Communist Party boss.
Although Mr.
Gorbachev's policy of glasnost,or openness,
made it possible to discuss Stalin's crimes
frankly, many Russians still choose not to
listen. A poll conducted this week asked
1,500 people what they think of Stalin, and
36 per cent, the largest share, feel the
dictator did the country more good than
harm. Another 29 per cent disagreed with
that statement, while the remaining
respondents were so split on how they felt
they couldn't answer one way or the other.
Forty-five
years after Nikita Khruschev denounced
Stalin in his famous "secret speech" to the
20th Communist Party Congress, it's clear
that many Russians are either unconvinced by
the evidence, or believe that whatever
Stalin did, he did for the good of the
country.
Mr. Roginsky
thinks that it's the latter phenomenon --
and that many Russians today still believe
in the idea of a "Great Russia" that
personal sacrifices must sometimes be made
for.
Unlike in
Germany, or post-apartheid South Africa,
there has never been a concentrated attempt
to prosecute those who knowingly took part
in crimes against humanity. There has been
no public discussion of compensating victims
or their families. Stalin's grave remains on
the Soviet Walk of Heroes along the Kremlin
wall. A fresh rose is place on it every day.
"The official
history still remembers Stalin as the great
commander-in-chief who defeated Hitler,"
Alexander Yakovlev, the former Soviet
ambassador to Canada and one of the chief
architects of glasnost,said in an interview
last year.
"No one wants to face the fact that he
killed 30 million of his own people, most of
whom disappeared without a trace. No one has
apologized for what they did, and most
people do not seem to care whether we
confront this chapter in our history or
not."
Mr. Roginsky
sees something more sinister than a
collective wish to forget in Russia's
unwillingness to deal with its past. To him,
it's proof that some of the traditions
Stalin initiated -- notably, the idea of
putting the needs of the state ahead of the
rights of the individual -- still hold sway
in the Kremlin today.
"It's not
that Stalin, this short, plain man matters
much anymore, it's what he left behind, his
legacy," Mr. Roginsky says. "The spirit of
Stalinism stayed with us. It's around us. .
. . Physically, we outlived him, but he's
still with us."
Tamara
Shumnaya, director of Moscow's Museum of
Contemporary History, is taking fire from
all sides right now because of an exhibit
entitled, "Stalin, the Man and the Symbol."
No one
objects to the subject matter. It's just
that no one is satisfied with what she and
the museum staff decided to include. Some
see too much about Stalin the great ruler,
and not enough about the executions and the
gulags. Others have exactly the opposite
complaint. The exhibit "should have helped
people remember the greatness of the country
and the greatness of the people under strong
leadership," reads one of the more tame
entries in the museum's guestbook.
Ms. Shumnaya
says she expected nothing less. "Fifty years
ago, there were different, controversial
opinions about Stalin, and there are the
same opposing perspectives now, too. We
wanted both opinions represented here. To be
objective."
The exhibit opens with thick books that list
the victims of Stalin's purges, which are in
a display case alongside a simple green
banner that reads "our parents don't have
graves." On the wall above are photographs
from the gulags.
The next
room, however, is where most museum visitors
spend a lot of time -- among the photographs
and propaganda posters of Stalin at the
height of his power. The most jarring
display features a group of dolls in a case,
against a background painted to resemble Red
Square, holding aloft a banner: "Thank you
Stalin for our happy childhoods."
Eventually,
visitors gather around a small TV set in the
corner to watch a black-and-white video of
the scene in Moscow the day of Stalin's
funeral. It's a short loop, and many of
those staring and remembering watch it three
or four times, as though comparing every
detail with their memories of that day.
Asked what they are thinking, they burst
into lengthy personal stories, as though
they've just been waiting to release pent-up
emotion.
"I listened
to the funeral on the radio. All the people
were crying," 75-year-old Yuri Timofeyev, a
retired metal worker, says as tears well in
his eyes at the memory. "He was a great
leader. It was a great loss."
Like many
older Russians, Mr. Timofeyev is dismayed at
how society has become more cutthroat since
communism ended and a wild breed of
capitalism swept into Russia to take its
place. Life was much better under Stalin, he
insists, gesturing sheepishly at his
tattered clothes.
"It was a
good time for us. We could study and we
could learn and we were never hungry. There
were no bandits, no hooligans -- there was
order. It would be a good thing to have that
order now. I will toast him on March 5th."
Standing two
paces away, 54-year-old Ludmilla Shumskaya
has the opposite reaction. "He was a bloody
monster. He destroyed all the talented
people, and all the witnesses of his
crimes." It's clear she has a personal story
beneath her rage, but she says she's still
not ready to talk about it, even half a
century later.
While most of
those taking in the exhibit one afternoon
this week are older Russians personally
connected with the Stalin era, a few
backpack-toting students show up after
school.
"The idea is
to form our own impressions," says
19-year-old Anatoli Balykin as he and two
friends pause by a poster that reads: "Glory
to Lenin, Glory to Stalin, Glory to the
Great October."
The history books he is given in school
offer a "neutral" portrait of the former
dictator, mentioning both the days of the
Red Terror and Stalin's role as a successful
wartime leader, Mr. Balykin says. "Many
young people respect him," he adds, and some
of his classmates regard the evidence that
millions were executed and sent to the
gulags as "just some figures."
His friend,
Artiom Dojev, also 19, says Russians alone
have the right to judge Stalin. "It's
interesting that in the West he is
considered a monster, but nobody there
suffered because of him. Here, people
suffered, and they still admire him."
"Stalin
wasn't just a symbol," the daily newspaper
Kommersant declared last week. "He continues
to exist in mass consciousness, not like a
historical figure, but like a folklore
image, someone like Dracula. Such persons
are doomed to be liked by the masses."
Of course,
they're also doomed to be imitated. An
acquaintance of the young Saddam Hussein
said the future Iraqi ruler used to sleep on
a cot under bookshelves that sagged with
books by and about Stalin. "One could say he
went to bed with the Russian dictator," the
friend famously quipped.
Since taking power, Mr. Hussein has
repeatedly showed what he learned from his
readings, ruthlessly using terror and
frequent purges to keep a firm grip on
power, staging phony elections and mass
executions.
Meanwhile,
his alleged "axis of evil" partner Kim Jong
Il has modelled his entire state on the
Stalinist vision. Run down a list of
notorious dictators -- from Fidel Castro in
Cuba to such lesser lights as Turkmenistan's
Sapuramad Niyazov and Belarus's Alexander
Lukashenko -- and each could cite the Soviet
icon as as a leading influence.
But in
Russia, even a dozen years into its
experiment with democracy, the echoes ring
eeriest. Every year, it seems, Russia has
taken another small step toward embracing a
past that most countries would be ashamed of
and apologizing for. This pattern has
accelerated since Vladimir Putin, a former
KGB agent, took office as president. In the
past four years, he has issued a set of
coins commemorating Stalin as war leader and
unveiled a Kremlin plaque in his honour. The
tune of the old Soviet anthem was brought
back, albeit with new words, and most
recently the red star was reinstated as the
symbol of the Russian military.
While
political opponents accuse Mr. Putin of
being a closet admirer of Stalin, it's
likely that much of his desire to turn back
the clock stems from the popular support for
doing so. Communists remain the country's
single biggest political party, and their
current leader, Gennady Zyuganov, has won
points with his largely rural following by
praising the Stalin era as a "great period"
and denouncing the allegations against him
as "slanderous."
Mr. Putin
also is the focus of a growing personality
cult that makes some observers nervous. The
President's likeness now can be found
everywhere -- on matryoshka dolls, T-shirts
and photographs hanging in homes and
offices. A recent pop hit referred to the
need for "a man like Putin." Entrepreneurs
across Russia have tried to name everything
from restaurants to a new breed of tomato
after him. Some are reminded of a time when
Stalin's image hung on every wall.
Mr. Roginsky of the Memorial group says that
"I don't blame Putin. He's not the guilty
party in this; he's just a creation of the
system. He's like Russian leaders always
have been. Most people don't share
democratic ideals. They just want order, no
corruption, security and social justice.
They think it's as simple as some nice guy,
some strong leader, coming in and doing it."
One young man has a much more basic
interpretation of what's going on. Yakov
Dzhugashvili, 30-year-old son of Yevgeny,
believes that, having kicked away at his
great-grandfather's reputation for 50 years,
history is taking a fresh look.
Unlike his
father, he doesn't believe that everything
Stalin did was right. Embarrassed by his
ancestry for years, he studied at the
Glasgow School of Art under a false name.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, and
his native Georgia's spiral into chaos and
poverty, he says he has come to understand
why his great-grandfather did what he did.
"He was right
in having ideals. Bad or good, people had
aims to reach in his time. Now, we don't
have any ideals at all, and that's very bad.
The deeper the crisis in Georgia gets, the
better I understand that Stalin wanted
society to be perfect. He wanted people to
live better."
On Wednesday,
he says, his family will gather to toast
Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili -- who
will be back among them. Yakov's father
Yevgeny explains that he insisted his infant
grandson be given the name his famous
forefather had been born with, and changed
as a young revolutionary.
"I wanted to bring back the name of Stalin,"
he says, "so it will live forever."
Mark
MacKinnon is The Globe and Mail's Moscow
Correspondent. A remarkable life
1879: Iosif
Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili is born the son
of a cobbler and ex-serf four days before
Christmas in Gori, Georgia. As a young
revolutionary, he will change his name to
Stalin, or Man of Steel.
1898: He
becomes a Marxist by joining a Georgian
social democratic organization.
1899: He is
expelled from the Tiflis Orthodox
Theological Seminary, where he has been
studying.
1902: Active
in the revolutionary underground, he is
exiled to Siberia.
1913: Having
returned, he is exiled again.
1917: By now
a leading Bolshevik, he plays an active role
in the October Revolution, later becoming
people's commissar for nationalities in the
first Soviet government and a member of the
Communist Party Politburo.
1920s: He
rises to party secretary-general, a post he
will hold from 1922 until his death. He
acquires great personal power thanks to his
administrative skills and to having his
rivals condemned as "deviationists" or
executed.
When Vladimir
Lenin, the father of the revolution, dies
two years later, Stalin pursues a policy of
building "socialism in one country," and
gradually isolates and disgraces even such
notable foes as Leon Trotsky, who is later
assassinated.
In 1928, in full control, Stalin tries to
revolutionize the Soviet economy by putting
it on a crash course of forced
collectivization and industrialization,
including the first of his infamous
five-year plans. Collectivization alone
drives an estimated 25 million farmers on to
state farms, killing by some estimates, as
many as 14.5 million people and reducing
agricultural output by 25 per cent.
1930s: Stalin launches his "great purge,"
ridding the party, government and
intelligentsia in which millions of
so-called "enemies of the people" (often
those who'd brought him to power) are
imprisoned, exiled, or shot. Perhaps 1.2
million people -- more than half the party
-- are arrested from 1936 to 1939. About
600,000 die or disappear into the harsh work
camps of the "gulag."
Also purged
is the military leadership, leaving the
Soviet Union unprepared for the Second World
War. In August, 1939, to avoid warfare,
Stalin agrees to a non-aggression pact with
Germany.
1940s: He disappears for two weeks after
Hitler invades anyway on June 22, 1941, then
returns to address the nation and assume
command of his troops. Initially, those
troops carry the burden of the fighting,
making the Soviet Union a member of the
Grand Alliance and allowing its
"generalissimo" to meet Winston Churchill
and Franklin Roosevelt at Tehran (1943) and
Yalta (1945), and then with Churchill and
Harry Truman in Potsdam (1945).
They divide the postwar world into "spheres
of influence," Soviet forces occupy most of
Eastern Europe and install Stalinist
regimes. Stalin resumes his repressive
measures at home, and conducts foreign
policies that contribute to the Cold War. He
anticipates an eventual clash with American
and British "imperialism" in which socialism
would triumph.
1950s:
Encouraged by the creation of the People's
Republic of China in October, 1949, he gives
the green light to North Korean leader Kim
Il Sung to attack South Korea in June, 1950.
March 5,
1953: He dies at 73 of natural causes.
Although the Korean War ends four months
later, Stalin's confrontational foreign
policy and domestic terror regime do not
follow him into the grave.
Three years later, he is denounced by
successor Nikita Khrushchev for committing
crimes against the party and building a
"cult of personality." But it isn't until
the late 1980s and Mikhail Gorbachev's
glasnost that "Stalinism" finally is
condemned officially and many of its victims
rehabilitated.
The Globe
and Mail; Saturday, March 1, 2003
|