|
Feeling blue
about the Orange Revolution; Since the two
heroes of their revolt split over an ugly
power struggle, the mood among Ukrainians
has slid from euphoria to disillusionment
KIEV
-- It's a familiar sight: Ukrainians
gathered under an orange flag in the centre
of Kiev, demanding change. But a year after
the euphoria of the Orange Revolution, the
last such banner still flying in the centre
of Kiev has a black ribbon of mourning tied
to it.
The 10
tired-looking men and women gathered under
it aren't celebrating the events of last
fall that brought President Viktor
Yushchenko to power. They're protesting the
betrayal of the ideals that brought so many
Ukrainians into the streets to support him.
“This is the
funeral of Yushchenko's politics,” said
Andrei, who gave only one name. The
38-year-old farm-equipment dealer has been
sleeping for weeks in a pup tent in front of
the Agriculture Ministry, a miniature
version of last year's sprawling tent city
that occupied Kiev's central Khreshchatyk
Street.
The
protesters, who say they were among the
crowds supporting the Orange Revolution,
initially set up the encampment to demand
the resignation of the Agriculture Minister
over rising prices in the industry.
Now they have
an additional demand: that Yulia Tymoshenko
be reinstated. The populist blond firebrand
who stood beside Mr. Yushchenko throughout
the uprising was recently fired as prime
minister after a very public spat with the
President over corruption.
“The two of
them led the revolution together, and they
should be in power together,” Andrei said.
In last year's revolt, tens of thousands of
orange-clad Ukrainians swarmed the centre of
Kiev for weeks to demand that a fraudulent
election result be overturned and that Mr.
Yushchenko be installed as president. It was
supposed to have marked a clear departure
from the corrupt, incestuous politics of the
country's recent past.
But Ukraine's mood since the Orange
Revolution has slid from initial euphoria at
the performance of the Yushchenko-Tymoshenko
team in office, to deep disillusionment at
how the two heroes of the revolt split after
an ugly power struggle.
Independence Square, where demonstrators
gathered daily last November and December,
is today a place where Ukrainians can go to
display their dismay at what's happened
since then.
Supporters of Viktor Yanukovich, the
pro-Russian candidate who vainly resisted
defeat at Mr. Yushchenko's hands, have
erected a garbage bin on the square where
people — about 70 of them a day — throw out
the orange flags and scarves of a year ago.
Orange was the colour of Mr. Yushchenko's
election campaign.
One of the
clearest signs that the Orange Revolution
has gone sour has been the re-emergence of
Mr. Yanukovich as a political power broker
in the country.
Mr.
Yushchenko struck a pact with Mr.
Yanukovich's party in exchange for the
parliamentary approval of Yuriy Yekhanurov
as Ms. Tymoshenko's replacement. The wording
of the deal provides immunity to many who
participated in the vote fraud that set off
the Orange Revolution.
The deal has been most disconcerting for
those who thought the uprising had finally
pulled Ukraine out of the Kremlin's orbit
after centuries of Russian domination. Mr.
Yanukovich was backed by Russian President
Vladimir Putin, and the defeated
presidential candidate brings his Russian
allies back to the Ukrainian political
scene.
“This
alliance of Yanukovich and Yushchenko will
dismay their supporters,” read a recent
editorial in the Ukraine Moloda newspaper,
which is normally pro-Yushchenko. “This
means that once more, east and west,
business and politics, will be mixed up.
Many of those who stood on Independence
Square will view this as a betrayal.”
“It's exactly
what we expected,'' said Sergei Markov, a
Kremlin-affiliated political analyst who was
in Kiev this week hosting a seminar on
Ukraine's political crisis. “The program of
the Orange Revolution was unrealistic. . . .
They prepared for a revolution, but had no
strategy for running the country after they
won.”
To complicate
matters further, Russian prosecutors
suddenly cancelled a long-standing arrest
warrant for Ms. Tymoshenko last weekend, a
signal that she may now ally herself with
the Kremlin in a bid to trump Mr.
Yushchenko's party in parliamentary
elections scheduled for next spring. (Ms.
Tymoshenko had been accused of illegally
siphoning off gas that was transiting
Russia.)
Most opinion
polls now put her popularity ahead of the
President's. “Yushchenko has always been
afraid of her,” said Sergei Ossipenko, an
aide to Ms. Tymoshenko.
It's not just
the political infighting that has people
disillusioned. The leaders of the Orange
Revolution have failed to deliver on almost
every key issue dear to their supporters.
The country
is no closer to joining the European Union —
a key, if unrealistic, promise often made by
both Mr. Yushchenko and Ms. Tymoshenko
during the uprising — than it was a year
ago.
They did not bring the country out of
isolation; in fact, foreign investment fell
under their leadership, and economic growth
slid to 6 per cent in the first half of this
year from 12 per cent in 2004. The
percentage of Ukrainians who believe the
country is headed in the right direction has
fallen from 43 per cent in April to 23 per
cent in a recent poll.
An investigation into the death of
opposition journalist Giorgiy Gongadze,
which many Ukrainians believe was carried
out by senior figures in the hated regime of
former president Leonid Kuchma, has gone
nowhere, leading the dead man's mother to
charge that the new authorities were no
better than the old ones and that she would
not shake Mr. Yushchenko's hand if she saw
him.
Amidst all
the disappointment, the allegations of
corruption have stood out as particularly
repulsive to Ukrainians who supported the
Yushchenko-Tymoshenko team hoping they would
put an end to the post-Soviet kleptocracy
under Mr. Kuchma. Disappointed insiders,
however, say members of the new government
behaved little differently than those who
preceded them.
Mr.
Yushchenko and Ms. Tymoshenko fell out after
Oleksander Zinchenko, the president's
chief-of-staff, quit his post in disgust
earlier this month, saying “corruption is
now even worse than before.”
Mr. Zinchenko specifically accused Petro
Porashenko, a key financial backer of the
Orange Revolution who later became head of
the National Defence and Security Council,
and Olexandr Tretyakov, an adviser to the
president, of nepotism and influence
peddling.
“People who
come to power still see the state as a huge
trough. They gorge themselves as quickly as
possible because they don't know how long
they're going to be there before the next
group comes along. It's been that way since
independence,” Dan Bilak said. Mr. Bilak, a
Canadian lawyer who has been advising the
government on legal reforms, was speaking in
general terms and not about recent
allegations.
The implosion
of the Orange Revolution was months in the
making. Mr. Porashenko, a millionaire
confectionary tycoon, and Ms. Tymoshenko,
herself a millionaire, were privately at
loggerheads even as they stood together in
front of the crowds on Independence Square.
By most
accounts, Mr. Porashenko, who was granted
extensive powers by the President, never
reconciled himself to Ms. Tymoshenko's
having got the top job. He ran the Security
Council as something close to an alternative
government and frequently clashed with Ms.
Tymoshenko and her cabinet on economic
policy.
Mr.
Porashenko favoured market-oriented
policies; Ms. Tymoshenko had a leftist,
populist approach. Neither was able to push
through the economic reforms they wanted.
“They were
very good at striking and leading protests,
but due to their personal characteristics,
they were not good at administering,” said
Yuriy Orobiets, an influential parliamentary
deputy. “They only ever had one thing in
common: opposition to Kuchma.”
As the
personality clash threatened to run his
presidency into the ground, Mr. Yushchenko
eventually decided he had no option but to
fire the entire government and start anew.
“He lost both his biggest political
supporter, Tymoshenko, and his biggest
financial supporter, Porashenko, at once,”
said a Western diplomat based in Kiev. “The
winner seems to be Yanukovich, and Russia
seems quite happy as well.”
Those inside
the corridors of power say they know the
people on the streets feel let down. Many
Ukrainians believed the
Yushchenko-Tymoshenko team was going to put
the country on a path to greater affluence
and integration into Europe. What they saw
instead was the new leaders behaving just
like the old ones, squabbling for influence
and trading accusations of corruption.
“It was not
just a surprise, it was a shock,” said
Kseniya Lyapina, a member of Mr.
Yushchenko's Our Ukraine party. “There was
this irrational, romantic idea that
Yushchenko and Tymoshenko would always
remain together [politically], and now this
romantic idea has been disproved.”
But despite
the spectacular setbacks, politicians and
ordinary Ukrainians alike are also quick to
point out that the country has nonetheless
made some strides from a year ago.
The
once-dreaded security services have lost
much of their influence, and society is more
open. Once the media were afraid to
criticize those in power, and today the
press is as vibrant and diverse as almost
anywhere in Europe. Once Ukrainians felt
they had no choice but to endure decades of
bad government; now they know that if the
authorities misstep, they can throw them out
of office, either via the ballot box or
otherwise.
“Before,
everyone worried only about himself or
herself, but in the time of the Orange
Revolution, people saw what they can
accomplish if they gather together,” said
Masha Boronina. The 20-year-old student from
Eastern Ukraine was helping this week to set
up another small tent camp, this one in
front of the country's Oil Ministry in a
protest against alleged corruption there.
Speaking of
her own small protest, she said she expected
it would succeed in bringing about change.
“They know the power of the people,” she
said.
The Globe
and Mail; 1 October 2005
|